Some people believe that they may have glossed over several important civil engineering failures in recent years, including the WTC collapse on 9/11 and the gross failures in NOLA from Hurricaine Katrina.
Labels: 9/11, ASCE, Boston Herald, engineering, Homeland Security, Katrina, science, Spending
Inquiring minds want to know...
Labels: crime, DB Cooper, FBI
Hillary Clinton may not realize it yet, but she’s just endured one of the worst weeks of her campaign.
Barack Obama weathered the Rev. Jeremiah Wright affair without serious damage to his nomination prospects. Obama still holds a tiny lead among Democrats nationally in the Gallup tracking poll, just as he did before this whole affair blew up.
Second, Obama’s lawyers successfully prevented re-votes in Florida and Michigan. That means it would be virtually impossible for Clinton to take a lead in either elected delegates or total primary votes.
Third, as Noam Scheiber of The New Republic has reported, most superdelegates have accepted Nancy Pelosi’s judgment that the winner of the elected delegates should get the nomination. Instead of lining up behind Clinton, they’re drifting away. Her lead among them has shrunk by about 60 in the past month, according to Avi Zenilman of Politico.com.
In short, Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects continue to dim. The door is closing. Night is coming. The end, however, is not near.
Last week, an important Clinton adviser told Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen (also of Politico) that Clinton had no more than a 10 percent chance of getting the nomination. Now, she’s probably down to a 5 percent chance.
Five percent.
Let’s take a look at what she’s going to put her party through for the sake of that 5 percent chance: The Democratic Party is probably going to have to endure another three months of daily sniping. For another three months, we’ll have the Carvilles likening the Obamaites to Judas and former generals accusing Clintonites of McCarthyism. For three months, we’ll have the daily round of résumé padding and sulfurous conference calls. We’ll have campaign aides blurting “blue dress” and only-because-he’s-black references as they let slip their private contempt.
For three more months (maybe more!) the campaign will proceed along in its Verdun-like pattern. There will be a steady rifle fire of character assassination from the underlings, interrupted by the occasional firestorm of artillery when the contest touches upon race, gender or patriotism. The policy debates between the two have been long exhausted, so the only way to get the public really engaged is by poking some raw national wound.
For the sake of that 5 percent, this will be the sourest spring. About a fifth of Clinton and Obama supporters now say they wouldn’t vote for the other candidate in the general election. Meanwhile, on the other side, voters get an unobstructed view of the Republican nominee. John McCain’s approval ratings have soared 11 points. He is now viewed positively by 67 percent of Americans. A month ago, McCain was losing to Obama among independents by double digits in a general election matchup. Now McCain has a lead among this group.
For three more months, Clinton is likely to hurt Obama even more against McCain, without hurting him against herself. And all this is happening so she can preserve that 5 percent chance.
When you step back and think about it, she is amazing. She possesses the audacity of hopelessness.
Why does she go on like this? Does Clinton privately believe that Obama is so incompetent that only she can deliver the policies they both support? Is she simply selfish, and willing to put her party through agony for the sake of her slender chance? Are leading Democrats so narcissistic that they would create bitter stagnation even if they were granted one-party rule?
The better answer is that Clinton’s long rear-guard action is the logical extension of her relentlessly political life.
For nearly 20 years, she has been encased in the apparatus of political celebrity. Look at her schedule as first lady and ever since. Think of the thousands of staged events, the tens of thousands of times she has pretended to be delighted to see someone she doesn’t know, the hundreds of thousands times she has recited empty clichés and exhortatory banalities, the millions of photos she has posed for in which she is supposed to appear empathetic or tough, the billions of politically opportune half-truths that have bounced around her head.
No wonder the Clinton campaign feels impersonal. It’s like a machine for the production of politics. It plows ahead from event to event following its own iron logic. The only question is whether Clinton herself can step outside the apparatus long enough to turn it off and withdraw voluntarily or whether she will force the rest of her party to intervene and jam the gears.
If she does the former, she would surprise everybody with a display of self-sacrifice. Her campaign would cruise along at a lower register until North Carolina, then use that as an occasion to withdraw. If she does not, she would soldier on doggedly, taking down as many allies as necessary.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, NY Times
Bill Richardson for Obama
Interesting...links
here and
here...gives Obama a boost at the end of this week after last week's pummeling. Actually, past of a good uptick from the speech on Monday and his subsequent speeches on Iraq Wednesday and Thursday.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Bill Richardson, Hillary Clinton
Thursday Quick Hits
- Some good Obama press...oh, and he's on Larry King Live tonite and was on some Philly sports talk station this morning that got everybody aflutter at the station...
- Two pieces (here, here) on the Obama race speech fall out...and an editorial cartoon which sums it all up...
- I was listening to this on Sean Hannity's radio program on the way home last night regarding that "Obama links to the black panthers" junk...here's Obama's response...and here something else about Rupert Murdoch, owner of Myspace, hosting Hezbollah and Hamas official myspace webpages. Hello, kettle? Why does FOX love terrorists?
- Obama on the Iraq War and how it sunks the economy in more ways than one (1, 2, 3)
- More on the defense of Obama from Huckabee...
- Oh, and with more digesting of Hill's FLOTUS daily calendar, she really overstated, OK, pretty much lied, about her not liking NAFTA the whole time, playing a big role in getting the Federal Family Leave Act passed, and lied about getting intel about China prior to her big 1995 speech there...that about raps er up again...
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, China, economy, Fox News, Hillary Clinton, Iraq, Sean Hannity, USA
Hillary's FLOTUS records
We start to see some kernel of truth:
As jounalists actually so their job and absorb 13,000+ pages of mind-numbing detail, more will be revealed...seems as tho on 1st glance, her
"FLOTUS-as-senior go get-er with all this experience" line of attack is overstating her resume.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton
I blogged about this at some point from a front-page WaPo article...I'll dig it out later...
Labels: Cheney, CIA, computer, dubya, engineering, military, Patriot Act, WaPo
71% think that Iraq hurts the ecomony...any wonder why
Obama will link the two tomorrow?
Ooops -
he talked about Iraq today too...and more on this from the
NYT...
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Democrats, economy, health care, Iraq, John McCain, Veterans
The Speech - The Reaction
Pretty universal in
praise -
and the
emotion...let's see what it does to Appalachia in PA & WV.
Here's the only thing I'll say about
Wright. Here's what
Mike Huckabee says about the whole thing - say what you will about HIS religious background, but he is certainly correct here.
And the YouTube speech has
gone wicked viral - over 1.25 million views since it got posted. Holy crap.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama
Apparently, the Sox coaching staff are not being paid to go to Japan - the players are all pocketing
$40,000 to go! This has Larry Lucchino written all over it.
Labels: baseball, effluvia
...it was apparently all
Ted Kennedy and Orrin Hatch that did the vast majority of legwork...here's the lead-in paragraph:
“Clinton, who has frequently described herself on the campaign trail as playing a pivotal role in forging a children's health insurance plan, had little to do with crafting the landmark legislation or ushering it through Congress, according to several lawmakers, staffers, and healthcare advocates involved in the issue.”
and I love this comment from the msnbc webpage:
FINALLY (!!) the media puts focus on the bogus and brazen and unsubstantiated claims of experience that have been put forth by the Clinton campaign...
So let's see now....
1) She failed in her secretive healthcare endeavor;
2) She didn't really do anything for SCHIP;
3) She didn't really bring peace to Northern Ireland;
4) She didn't really open the borders in Bosnia;
5) She didn't have any security clearances while first lady;
6) She didn'e even have a national security team on her staff while first lady;
7) She claims a speech in China as experience but at the same time disses Obama as merely giving speeches;
What EXACTLY does this campaign have to [claim] as experience?????
Labels: 2008 Elections, Boston Globe, health care, Hillary Clinton, NBC
Mark Penn, Please STFU
Whenever he
opens his
mouth, reality-divorced wingnuts
fall out...thanks for destroying the party! To think
he started this in 2007 before Iowa!!
[update] More on this Park Penn STFU topic...here's
Ed Rendell, Gov. of PA and uber supporter of Clinton, stating that either of the Democrats remaining will take PA, essentially a smackdown of Mr. Penn. Someone should just call him a
stupidhead.
And, there's this
Obama retort to a Penn-inspired Hillary memo that takes the cake.
And, regardless, tick, tick, tick
Obama gains more superdels...
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Mark Penn
Friday Quick Hits
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, effluvia, energy policy, engineering, ethanol, global warming, green, Hillary Clinton, Jewish, science
NSA Requested Wiretaps BEFORE 9/11
According to the UK study, antibiotics do nothing for 14 of 15 cases of sinusitis, even when it has been going on for 7-10 days!!!
Labels: BBC, effluvia, medicine, science
Thursday Quick Hits
One post v. many today...just because...
* Great post by
Kos on Clinton's strategy of turning Obama into just another black man and discredit the caucus system. Could not agree more.
* A
great great post on the Burnt Orange Report about stopping with the stupid in what is supposed to be a humerous editorial, but really eviscerates the stupid Hillary talking points strategy in yet another way...one key point is that McCain won CA and NY, so does that mean Hillary and McCain will BOTH win them in a general election fight? Come on, end the stupid, Hills.
* AMERICABlog post on
Ferraro leaving the Hillary campaign now that she's done the dirty work - and we know that she's been race-baiting for several seeks now (see the
Olbermann Special Comment). Speaking of comment,
a comment on the Comment here...and how
Howard Ickes tells a group of supporters that she can only win thorugh SuperDelegates...
* Some
Mark Penn YouTube moment of him doing something Ferraro-ish...
* Two TPM posts about the ugly way that Clinton is slogging her way
through to losing the primaries by throwing all these
harsh bombs, including mailers about Obama's supposed support of Farrakhan because Farrrakhan came out in support of him...?
* A great
Robert Reich post about the coming recession and how it could spiral in to Depression and the coincident nature of our current situation to that of America in 1929-1932...
* the
Space Shuttle docks with the space station...
* Spitzer's , er,
ladyfriend, and Red Sox pitcher Clay Bucholz's
new special ladyfriend...
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, baseball, Bill Clinton, computer, Democrats, effluvia, engineering, Hillary Clinton, Keith Olbermann, science, space
Olbermann Special Comment On Hillary/Ferraro
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton
Big State Math For Obama
Two links - this one
about four Obama governor supporters striking back at the stupid "Hillary wins big states" frame...and this one from
dailykos about all the math, essentially showing the same thing. And for shits, here's Cenc Ugyar saying that
Hillary needs to throw in the towel because of the math...
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton
Somebody actually called Sinbad the comedian about this little Hillary trip to the Balkans with him, Cheryl Crow and Chelsea...interesting reaction.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton
Kitchen Sink Strategy Showing Dazzling Array of Rhetorical Contradictions
First, there's this bit from
Mark Penn about how Obama is too liberal (
never mind that this is an attack from a Democrat) and we're reminded in the piece that Mark Penn recently said that Obama wasn't a real Democrat since he gets support from independants and republicans...and a reminder that
Penn's company advises McCain, too...
Then, there's
Bill Clinton saying that Hillary/Obama would be a dream ticket. And of course,
Obama just today reminds us of
the hilarity of all of this attacking:
"I don't know how somebody who is in second place is offering the vice
presidency to someone who is first place," Obama said, drawing cheers and a
standing ovation from about 1,700 people in Columbus, Miss. Saying he wanted to be "absolutely clear," he added: "I don't want anybody here thinking that 'Somehow maybe I can get both'" by nominating Clinton as president and assuming he would be her running mate. "You have to make a choice in this election," he said. Obama aides said Clinton's recent hints that she might welcome him as her vice presidential candidate appeared meant to diminish him and to attract undecided voters in the remaining primary states by suggesting they can have a "dream ticket."
Obama had never suggested he might accept a second spot on the ticket. But until Monday he had not ridiculed the notion so directly, even if he did completely rule it out in Shermanesque terms.
He told the audience that it made no sense for Clinton to suggest he is not ready to be president and then hint that she might hand him the job that could make him president at a moment's notice.
"If I'm not ready, how is it you think I would be such a great vice president?" he said, as the crowd laughed and cheered loudly.
And the quote that was in Rawstory and not Yahoo! (dont know why):
"If I'm not ready, how is it that you think I would be such a great vice president. Do you understand that? ... They are trying to hoodwink you," he said. "You can't say he's not ready on day one, unless he'd be your vice president, then he's ready on day one."
That about raps' er up as far as the rhetorical mudslinging from Hills. She's now flung so much poo that we've come full circle. And dont forget about the tax return stuff - you can look up my previous post on that hypocritical turd.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton
I'm on a roll when I should be playing with spreadsheets...
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton
He may have said on the Colbert Report that he was being neutral, but he sure sounds pretty disappointed with the way Hillary is acting these days.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Robert Reich
...was a net win of a delegate. Kis brings up a good point - why didn't Hillary try to stump to take the IL-14 seat for Bill Foster? Answer: she dont give two farts about down-ticket crap. This race was the closest thing to a proxy fight that we're going to see before the fall, and Obama v. McCain was a loser for the GOoPerS.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John McCain
Two more ex-Clintonistas defect to the Obama side.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton
To quote:
Hillary Clinton’s constant touting of her vast foreign policy experience is finally starting to get examined. Suddenly, the scales are falling off the eyes of a willing press corps who are saying, Oh, that’s right, she actually doesn’t have any foreign policy experience. I’m reminded of the story of The Emperor’s New Clothes although one would hope the parallels stopped short of Clinton parading around in public naked; nobody wants to see that.
At any rate, Clinton’s most recent statement on the matter is finally raising eyebrows:
You know, I was involved for 15 years in, you know, foreign policy and security policy. You know, I helped to bring peace to Northern Ireland. I negotiated open borders to let fleeing refugees into safety from Kosovo. I’ve been standing up against, you know, the Chinese government over women’s rights and standing up for human rights in many different places. I’ve served on the Senate Armed Services Committee. And I was the only senator of either party asked to be on an important task force put together by the Pentagon under this administration to figure out what to do with our military going forward.
Lord David Trimble, who won the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in Northern
Ireland, calls these claims “silly.”
“I don’t know there was much she did apart from accompanying Bill [Clinton] going around,” he said. Her recent statements about being deeply involved were merely “the sort of thing people put in their canvassing leaflets” during elections. “She visited when things were happening, saw what was going on, she can certainly say it was part of her experience. I don’t want to rain on the thing for her but being a cheerleader for something is slightly different from being a principal player.”
Another source who should know, albeit one with an obvious agenda in downplaying Mrs. Clinton’s accomplishments, piles on:
“She was never asked to do the heavy lifting” when meeting with foreign leaders, said Susan Rice, who was an assistant secretary of state in the Clinton administration and is now advising Obama. “She wasn’t asked to move the mountain or deliver a harsh message or a veiled threat. It was all gentle prodding or constructive reinforcement. And it would not have been appropriate for her to do the heavy lifting.”
Several other observers say much the same thing in that piece. An exception:
Former Sen. George Mitchell, who was the lead U.S. negotiator, said Clinton’s visits were “very helpful.” “She was especially involved in encouraging women to get involved in the peace process,” which was a “significant factor” in the agreement, Mitchell said in an interview. [RBE note: this does not exactly sound like Hillary's campaign frame anyways; it almost reinforces the growing - and correct - frame that she didn't do much except be there for show]
Josh Marshall’s post on the subject is entitled “Please.”
These are the sorts of puffed up claims that get other candidates held up to mockery and derision. But Clinton is using them as cudgels in her effort to portray Obama as a lightweight with no experience dealing with foreign policy crises. And basically she’s getting a pass. I guess it speaks to the advantages of staying on offense, which can never be gainsaid. But she’s still getting a big pass on this and a lot else.
Hilzoy compiles a blow-by-blow on Clinton’s claims and finds them, to say the least,
strained. Bruce McQuain has somefun, too. Ultimately, I more-or-less agree with Steve Benen on this.
Clinton, as far as I’m concerned, is qualified to be commander-in-chief. She’s been a senator for eight years; she’s a bright and creative thinker; she’s served on the Senate Armed Services Committee; and she’s seen various foreign policy failures and successes up close over the last 16 years. If she were president, she’d have my full confidence. Which is all the more reason that I’m puzzled by the style and substance of her campaign pitch. Clinton simply isn’t a Joe Biden-like candidate. Why pretend that she is? And should she get the nomination, won’t this mistake be magnified by an opponent whose background is more extensive than her own? [rbe - emplasis mine]
At the very least, she’s making John McCain’s job easier in November, especially if Obama is the candidate. And, even Clinton pulls off the upset, she has bolstered McCain’s premise, that experience in matters of international security is the top voting issue by which a president should be judged, very nicely.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Hillary Clinton
And the Hillary hillarity continues...
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton
Fucking hillarious. He wins WY 61%-38%. Oh, and he wins the TX caucus and overall nets more delegates from March 4th.
Also, more
fixing the frame for the media re: Hillary's supposed momentum...
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton
TPM has two bits getting her on her commander-in-chief "creds"
here...
Labels: 2008 Elections, Hillary Clinton
When is Hillary's
disfunctional camp going to stop acting like a bunch of fucking republicans? Why doesn't she run on her fucking record? Oh, I know - cause over 1/2 of those 35 years of service she was a first lady to the USA or to Arkansas.
Those, last I recall, are not elected offices. She opens herself up to a lot of issues with her attaking, kitchen sink throwing strategy...
Oh, and it turns out
HER CAMP gave the off-hand remark about the NAFTA thing to the Canadians. Now, she's just a fucking hypocrite in high heels.
Oh, by the way, release your damn taxes.
Hypocrite. And stop
race-baiting. You
cannot win anyways.
[update march 07] This exchange about Hillary's 3 AM commercial that fearmongers...Labels: 2008 Elections, Hillary Clinton
The few things I wish I still had cable for...
Labels: 2008 Elections, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton
Glad That Yahoo! Got the Headline Right...
It reads "While John McCain clinched the GOP nomination, Clinton's big wins only narrow Obama's lead."
And, from a couple of sources, Hillary may have only gained 1-2 net delegates from last night. Ohio, yes, won big. Texas getting 51%? Not big. Obama still wins the caucus and it's delegate share.
All in all, it is a fascinating race to behold, since we see the intricacies of the democratic primary/caucus procedures and how they vary wildly between each state...Washington state and Texas come to mind as being the most rediculous.
Labels: 2008 Elections, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John McCain
been meaning to post this since sunday...